CASE NAME : BIHARI CHOWDHARY VS. STATE OF BIHAR AUTHOR : PARUL (UPES, DEHRADUN) CITATION 1984 (2) SCC 627 BENCH 1. JUSTICE A.P. SEN 2. JUSTICE BALAKRISHNA ERADI INTRODUCTION The present case deals with the section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908, which talks about Suit against government. Institution of suit can be done
Case Name : The Chairman, Railway Board & Ors. Vs. Mrs. Chandrima Das Author : Aprajita Priyadarshni EQUIVALENT CITATIONS AIR 2000 SC 98, (2000) 2 SCC 465 BENCH Mr. R. P. Sethi, Mr. S. Saghir Anand INTRODUCTION This case has been brought up by a petition filed under Article 226 by Mrs. Chandrima Das who
Case Name Banarsi Das vs. Ram Phal, (2003) 9 SCC 606. Author : Pallabi Paul Citation (2003) 9 SCC 606. Bench R.C. Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar Introduction This case was related to a suit for explicit execution of a consent to sell went into between the gatherings, at that point novated by an arrangement at that
Case Name : Upendra Sharma Vs. State Of Bihar & Anr. 2018 12 SC Author : Arthi M CITATION ARISING FROM SLP (C) NO.277 OF 2016 BENCH HON’BLE JUSTICE MR.ROY AND JOSEPH INTRODUCTION Both the appellants, Upendra Sharma and the Dasrath Sharma stand convicted under section 354 of Indian penal code and sentenced to undergo
AUTHOR : ARTHI M CASE NAME Shyam Narayan Chouksey Vs. Union Of India & Others 2018 8 SC. CITATION CIVIL NO 855 OF 2016 BENCH HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. DIPAK MISRA INTRODUCTION In this case the Petitioner approached a court under article 32 of the constitution for issue of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate
Author : Arthi M Case Name: State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs Raj Kumar 2018 7 SC CITATION: 1204 of 2015 BENCH HON’BLE JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI J INTRODUCTION This appeal is preferred by the state challenging the judgment of high court of Himachal Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.559 of 2018 acquitting the respondent under section 302 of
Author : Gargi Soman 1. Introduction: This was a landmark judgement which changed the fabric of how elections were conducted in India. It led to the imposition of emergency in India, and the judgement was pronounced in an emergency-stricken India. It was a case that challenged the basic structure of India and also raised questions
Author : ARTHI M CITATION 2018 SC CIVIL APPEAL NO 3227 OF 2006 BENCH HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A BHUSHAN, A SIKRI INTRODUCTION The present case of Theiry Santhanamal Vs Viswanathan & Ors. deals with the matter of suit property and there other properties. FACTS Since the said property belonged to Mr. Mariasusai Mudaliar who was the
CASE NAME : Regina v. Dudley and Stephens AUTHOR : Suchandra Mukherjee EQUIVALENT CITATION 14 Q.B.D. 273 BENCH Chief Justice Lord Coleridge INTRODUCTION Necessity as a defense is defined under section 81 in Indian Penal Code As per section 81 when a act is done to harm but which doesn’t have the parameter of criminal
