Author: Mayank raj Case: Kedar Nath Singh vs. State of Bihar. Citation: 1962 AIR 955, 1962 SCR Sulp. (2) 769. Bench: Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha (C.J.), A.K. Sarkar, J.R. Madholkar, N.Rajagopala Ayyangar, S.K.Das. Introduction– Thomas Babington Macaulay who drafted the sedition law and was added in the Indian Penal code in 1870, section 124A which says
Case Name: Central Bank Of India Ltd vs. Ram Narain Author: Sameer M EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: 1955 AIR 36,1955 SCR(1)697 BENCH: Mr.Justice Mahajan Mehar Chand(CJ), Mukherjea, B.K Bose, Vivian, Jagannadhadas, B.Aiyyar, T.L. Venkatarama. INTRODUCTION: In Indian Penal Code, 1860 their was a provision to which punish Indian citizens who commits crime outside India. Under Section 4
Author : J. Shuruthi Case Name : B.K. Narayana Pillai Vs. Parameswaran Pillai A) CITATION: (2000) 1 SCC 712 B) BENCH: Justice S.P.Kurdukara Justice R.P.Sethi C) INTRODUCTION: The case explains about the amendment of written statements as under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The defendant has the right to take amendments
Author: Mayank Raj Case Name: Gyarsibai w/o Jagannath Vs. The State Citation: 1953 CriLJ 588 Bench: Dixit and Chatuarvedi Introduction: In the case, Gyarsibai vs. The State, the appellant were preceded before of the session decide of Shajapur of an offence under the Section 302 IPC for the murder of herself and 3 children and
Author: Divya Bhargava Case Name: R Vs. Brown Equivalent Citation [1993] 2 All ER 75 Bench Lord Templeman, Lord Jauncey , Lord Lowry , Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn Introduction The issue of consent plays a very important role when charging of defendants in the sexual offence. or charging someone with section 47 of the
Case Name : State of Maharashtra Vs. Mohd. Yakub and Others Author : Shraddha Jindal Equivalent Citation: 1980 AIR 1111 1980 SCR (2)1158 1980 SCC (3) 57 Bench: Justice R. S. SarkariaJustice Ranjit Singh preprationJustice Chinnappa Reddy Introduction: In the present case of ” state of Maharashtra vs. Mohammed Yakub and others” a clear distinction
Author : Aditi Gupta CASE NAME : RAM BHAJAN DAS VS. UNION OF INDIA, 2018 CITATION Decided on 28/11/2018 Writ petition (C) 52 of 2016 BENCH Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta INTRODUCTION Under article 142 Supreme Court in the order of its jurisdiction may pass orders necessary for doing justice
CASE NAME: CHUNDA MURMU VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL WATERS EQUIVALENT CITATION: AIR 2010 SC 2160 BENCH: SWATANTER KUMAR AND RAJAN GOGOI JJ. PROVISION INVOLVED: Section 201 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. INTRODUCTION The Section 302 of the Penal Code lays down the punishment for the offence of Murder. The punishment prescribed under
Case name : Subrata Roy Sahara Vs. Union of India Author : Khushboo Chopra Citation AIR 2014 SC 3241 Bench K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.S. KHEHAR Introduction The case is regarded as one of the landmark judgements in the matter of the power and jurisdiction of the securities exchange board of India in case of
Case Name : Bablu Hussain Vs. State of Rajasthan Author : Akash Krishnan Citation Appeal (crl.) 1302 of 2006 Bench Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT & S.H. KAPADIA Introduction Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code defines murder as an act which is done with the intention to cause death with adequate amount of force which would
