Author: Mayank Raj Case Name: Charan Lal Sahu vs. Giani Zail Singh Citation 1984 AIR 309, 1984 SCR (2) 6. Bench Y.V. CHANDRACHUD (CJ), P.N.BHAGWATI, AMARENDRA NATH SEN, D.P.MADON, M.P.THAKKAR. Introduction The case Charan Lal Sahu vs. Giani Zail Singh is that the election would be held for the President of India nominations were filed
Case : Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India, 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR(2) 621 Author: Kanu Priya Introduction: The judgement of this case was delivered by 7- judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 25th January 1978, this decision marked the development of a new era with respect to the interpretation of fundamental rights
Author: V Nivetha (Dr. Ambedkar Law University, School of Excellence in Law) BACKGROUND OF THE CASE The present case is the landmark judgement on speedy trial of cases in India which became a fundamental right of every accused person that was unnoticed so far. The case shocked the State of affiars in regard to the
Author: Arushi Banta CITATION 1983 AIR 1086, 1983 SCR (3) 508 BENCH CJ Y.V. Chandrachud Amarendra Nath Sen Ranganath Misra INTRODUCTION This case involved the interpretation of Article 32 of the Constitution of India. This case marks the beginning of awarding compensation in case of violation of fundamental rights. FACTS In the year 1953, Mr.
Author: Aditi Gupta CITATION [2010] INSC 544 (26 July 2010) BENCH P. SATHASIVAM B. S . CHAUHAN INTRODUCTION In the case of BIPIN KUMAR MONDAL vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL , an appeal has been filed against the judgment passed on 13th July , 2005 criminal appeal No. 352 of 2001 by the high court
Author: Mrinal Kedar Citation AIR 1981 AP 246. Bench Honorable Justice Mr. P. Choudary. Introduction The present case of the Reserve Bank of India Employees Association v. The Reserve Bank of India and Ors. deals with a caveat filed by the appellants apprehending that an application might be filed by the respondent. The petition filed
Author: Megha Garg Case Name: Bismillah Khan Vs. Union of India & Ors. Equivalent Citation: W.P. 928 (W) of 2020 Bench: The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharya Introduction This particular talks about the citizenship of India. Section 5(1)(c) states that A person who is married to an Indian citizen and is ordinarily resident in India for
Author – Megha Garg Equivalent citations: 1975 AIR 246, 1975 SCR (1) 561 Bench Khanna, Hans Raj Introduction This is an appeal case in which the appellants murdered two people. Section 302 the Murder Punishment, that, anyone who kills another person shall be sentenced with death, or [capital punishment], and shall also be liable for
Author: Megha Garg Equivalent citations: 1962 AIR 605, 1962 SCR Supl. (1) 567 Bench Subbarao, K Introduction K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, a landmark case in India’s criminal history, has been a topic debated as ever since. This decision took its place the moment it was pronounced. This case was the last case to
Author: Shraddha Jindal EQUIVALENT CITATIONS: (1888) ILR 12 Bom 377 BENCH: Mr. Justice Birdwood Mr. Justice Parsons INTRODUCTION: The present case of “Bhawoo Jivaji vs Mulji Dayal” explains that what comes under the ambit of “wrongful restraint and confinement” and why a public servant who is on duty cannot be held liable for it. Section
